APPROACHES AND METHODS OF TEACHING ENGLISH FOR STUDENTS OF MARITIME HIGHER EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENTS: HISTORICAL OVERVIEW

  • Riabukha І. М. Kherson State Maritime Academy
Keywords: English for Specific Purposes, language teaching methods, pedagogical approaches, communicative method, eclectic approach, foreign language education

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of various approaches and methods used in teaching English as a second language, with particular attention to English for Specific Purposes (ESP).
It is demonstrated that language teaching has a long, complex, and evolving history, characterised by ongoing debates regarding the appropriateness and effectiveness of different teaching methods. Scholars and linguists worldwide have developed and applied diverse pedagogical approaches to enhance the effectiveness of English language instruction across various professional and academic contexts.
Given the status of English as a global language, it is essential to examine the broad spectrum of teaching approaches and methods employed in modern education. The study emphasises that within the contemporary pedagogical landscape, which increasingly supports an eclectic approach to ESP instruction, a historical understanding of these methods is necessary for evaluating their relevance in developing specific language competencies.
The research provides an overview of major pedagogical approaches, including structural and communicative frameworks, as well as prominent methodologies such as the grammar-translation method, direct method, audio-lingual method, and others.
It is highlighted that each method has introduced valuable innovations and addressed specific language learning challenges. However, these methods emerged in distinct historical contexts, reflected diverse social and educational demands, and were grounded in different theoretical perspectives. A review of academic discourse reveals multiple pedagogical frameworks shaped by educational, communicative, and professional priorities characteristic of different historical periods.
The study concludes that the diversity of learners’ needs in mastering the English language makes reliance on a single instructional method impractical. Therefore, a composite or eclectic pedagogical approach, integrating multiple methods and techniques, represents the most effective and flexible solution for addressing the individual goals and needs of learners.

Received: February 16, 2026
Accepted: March 04, 2026
Published: May 28, 2026

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Riabukha І. М., Kherson State Maritime Academy

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of English in Ship Power Engineering

References

Херсонщина: від найдавніших часів до сьогодення: навч.-метод. посіб. для вищих та загальноосвіт. навч. закл. / Л. О. Цибуленко [та ін.]. Херсон: Вишемирський В. С., 2017. 417 с.

Babayev J. Characteristics of the Direct method. Euro-Global Journal of Linguistics and Language Education. 2025. Vol. 2, No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69760/EGJLLE.2500012

Celce-Murcia M. et. al. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. 4th ed. Boston: National Geographic Learning., 2014. 707 p.

Ellis R. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press., 2003. 120 p.

Gill A. K., Kusum D. Teaching Approaches, Methods and Strategy. Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies. 2016. Vol. 4, No. 36. Pр. 6692- 6697.

Grabe W., Stoller F. L. Teaching and researching reading. 3-rd Edition. Routledge. 2011. 340 p.

Kumaravadivelu B. Understanding Language Teaching: From Method to Postmethod (1st ed.). Routledge. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615725

Padmaja D. The Historical Perspective of Language Teaching – A Brief Study. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Research. 2013. No. 1(1). Pр. 110-114.

Pica T. Second language acquisition research: Applied and applicable. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2003. 36 p.

Richards J., Rodgers T. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305.001

Salmanova S. Communicative Approach in Foreign Language Teaching: Advantages and Limitations. EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education. 2025. No. 2(1). Pр. 79-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69760/egjlle.250009

Swain M., Lapkin S. Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics. 1995. No. 16(3). Pр. 371-391.

Thirumalai M. S. Chapter One. In An Introduction to TESOL: Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Language in India. 2002. URL: https://www.languageinindia.com/april2002/tesolbook.html

Tickoo M. L. Towards an alternative curriculum in Acquisition-poor Environments. TESOL Quarterly. 1999. No. 33(3). Pp. 347-365.

Zhang L., Hanim Ismail H., Sulaiman N. A. Content-Based Instruction in Language Education: A Bibliometric Review. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 2024. No. 6(4). Pр. 388–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i4.6845

Published
2026-05-28
How to Cite
Riabukha І. М. (2026). APPROACHES AND METHODS OF TEACHING ENGLISH FOR STUDENTS OF MARITIME HIGHER EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENTS: HISTORICAL OVERVIEW. PEDAGOGICAL ALMANAC, (62), 188-196. https://doi.org/10.37915/pa.vi62.751
Section
HISTORY OF PEDAGOGY